Welp...”pissgate” dossier was written with info from Clinton Campaign

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I know, I get it, bt's a "Russia collusion" special council though. Mueller was appointed to investigate Russian collusion in the 2016 election.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by g00s3y View Post
      Didn't know Sean Hannity had an account here with the username "Moose".
      At least I'd be someone of notoriety, not some faggot shitlib that is known for softcore porn avatars on a male dominated site.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Moose View Post
        I know, I get it, bt's a "Russia collusion" special council though. Mueller was appointed to investigate Russian collusion in the 2016 election.
        I don't disagree that this appears to be outside the scope of his investigation. But what's to stop him from closing that investigation for a lack of evidence, then launching an entirely new investigation based following the "new" "leads"?

        Comment


        • #19
          disrespecting softcore porn avis is crossing the line smh keep it politics yall

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Snitch Clique View Post

            I don't disagree that this appears to be outside the scope of his investigation. But what's to stop him from closing that investigation for a lack of evidence, then launching an entirely new investigation based following the "new" "leads"?
            I’d welcome that, with legitimate cause. My issue is they lose credibility when it’s supposed to be a Russia investigation, nothing turns up, they move on to the next thing. Stay in your lane, if nothing turns up, close the case. Then make your case for being appointed for a new investigation.

            Problem solved. What they’re doing gives more ammo for Trump to say it’s a which hunt, and rightfully so as it appears.

            Comment


            • #21
              Lmao government doesn't give a fuck, if they found giant bags of weed in your house during an unlawful search I guarantee you the local police department will have some kind of PI on your ass.

              Comment


              • #22
                Because that’s the same thing.

                Comment


                • #23
                  It's an analogy...

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Yeah, a terrible one.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Well it was under the presumption that the investigation was unlawful as many trump supporters keep touting about. I thought it might click with you, guess everything just went over your head now you're livid.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        No, you're just retarded.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Moose View Post

                          I’d welcome that, with legitimate cause. My issue is they lose credibility when it’s supposed to be a Russia investigation, nothing turns up, they move on to the next thing. Stay in your lane, if nothing turns up, close the case. Then make your case for being appointed for a new investigation.

                          Problem solved. What they’re doing gives more ammo for Trump to say it’s a which hunt, and rightfully so as it appears.
                          I don't think they're handling the case well, I don't think they handle many cases well in general. I do think there's something to the Russian investigation, too many coincidences. However, I also wouldn't lose sleep if they found nothing at all. I could be wrong, but I don't think there's a statue of limitations on this investigations, so they can dig for his entire presidency if they want. I also don't know enough about the legal precedence to determine if they're required to open a new, separate investigation for things that aren't directly tied to Russia. For all I know if it came up while investigating Russia, they're well within their rights to add it to the pile, despite it appearing unrelated. These agencies have always been sloppy.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            A trump supporter calling someone a retard is like the leaf calling the bud green....

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Snitch Clique View Post

                              I don't think they're handling the case well, I don't think they handle many cases well in general. I do think there's something to the Russian investigation, too many coincidences. However, I also wouldn't lose sleep if they found nothing at all. I could be wrong, but I don't think there's a statue of limitations on this investigations, so they can dig for his entire presidency if they want. I also don't know enough about the legal precedence to determine if they're required to open a new, separate investigation for things that aren't directly tied to Russia. For all I know if it came up while investigating Russia, they're well within their rights to add it to the pile, despite it appearing unrelated. These agencies have always been sloppy.
                              I mean, if they are legitimately looking into Russia, fine. I personally don't think there's "Russian collusion", but who knows. The meaning of that changes every person you ask. Lol and if there legitimately some shit going down with Russia, that is 100% a problem and we should do something about it. Piling on, I get to an extent, but when it comes to grasping at straws trying to get an obstruction charge is different.

                              All the new text messages being released, is pointing to that it's just a sham. I don't know, I won't claim to, but I don't think it's legitimate. As far as separate investigations, I don't know either. You'd think they'd need to do something different or hand it over to another bureau that would handle it. I agree they're not handling it well, it's very messy and that's a problem for both sides.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Moose View Post

                                I mean, if they are legitimately looking into Russia, fine. I personally don't think there's "Russian collusion", but who knows. The meaning of that changes every person you ask. Lol and if there legitimately some shit going down with Russia, that is 100% a problem and we should do something about it. Piling on, I get to an extent, but when it comes to grasping at straws trying to get an obstruction charge is different.

                                All the new text messages being released, is pointing to that it's just a sham. I don't know, I won't claim to, but I don't think it's legitimate. As far as separate investigations, I don't know either. You'd think they'd need to do something different or hand it over to another bureau that would handle it. I agree they're not handling it well, it's very messy and that's a problem for both sides.
                                This all comes down to definition. The Russian government has no known connection with groups of russian people using English sites and Western social media to pose as Americans with different perspectives/opinions. Before you get triggered putin himself admitted to this because his hands are technically clean. His exact words is "if they are patriotically minded they start making their contributions,which are right, from their point of view to the fight against those who say bad things about Russia" he followed it up with "is that possible? Theoretically, it is possible". He even went further into this saying "On a state level, we haven't been involved in this".

                                Now when you hear people mentioning russian bots, what they're mentioning is people specifically groups of people creating multiple accounts posing as Americans from different political spectrum and trying to demonize either side to inflame identity politics. Now we make the argument there are groups of people all around the world doing this thing, but when we look at the actual research done and studies shown, and evidence pulled up by our government, we see that it was overwhelmingly Russians. Another thing to keep in mind is that it's in Russias interest to keep Americans divided so we cannot talk about policy or get things done. By confusing the electorate with inflamed identity politics they can easily keep who they want out and get who they want in. All they have to do is pay a few nerds to sit in their basement propping up political garbage on social media.

                                There's examples of this, look at so called fake news. CNN was pulling uneducated trump supporters then telling them to say some outrageous shit just so they could make a story and get ratings out of something with no substance. Essentially thats what the Russians have done here, but instead of ratings it's foreign policy. This isn't to discredit the immense stupidity of americans which there are tons of americans genuinely buying into this shit and posting idiotic political narratives. But it's been shown and proven that even before the election started there were Russians posing as americans trying to prime their vote. Majority of people don't research what they hear on facebook, they just believe it at face value. Obama mentioned this being a problem with the internet, it allows us to create bubbles and stay in our bubbles, social media actually does this in their algorithms. Watch leftist youtube videos u get leftist recommendations, watch alex jones you get lizard people illuminati recommendations. People are misusing the internet and force feeding themselfs their own regurgitated vomit.



                                Now before you make the claim "I don't personally think theres russian collusion" step out of your bubble, calm the fuck down, and go do the research. I'm willing to bet you'll respond with either A) an attack or B) Fake News.

                                Either way your personal problem boils down to your lack of regard for the seriousness of the modern political issues you're hearing about. I know this based off your post history. I just want to make this clear as day, I am smart, educated, and well informed. You however, are delusional and willfully ignorant. I've met homeless crackheads who have more sound opinions than you. Good day sir'

                                Comment

                                Top Active Users

                                Collapse

                                There are no top active users.

                                Unconfigured Ad Widget

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X