Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

[txtc]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

reporting a sexual assault as soon as it happens and not 90 years later might help

[Robin Williams]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

reporting a sexual assault as soon as it happens and not 90 years later might help

Reporting sexual allegations against someone in power back in the 60s - 90s wasn't something people commonly thought to do because liberal SJWs like me hadn't empowered women yet.

[iHigh]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

I am happy Moore lost-- dude was a fucktard

[ekeanon]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

Please show me where anything was busted, that hasn't been proven incorrect. The "forged yearbook entry" hoax was already debunked. The "paid to claim they were assaulted" narrative was debunked.

So please show me any actual evidence that these claims were "busted". Instead of just perpetuating the same nonsense that has already been recanted from fake twitter accounts.

First off, the sole fact she waited THAT long to come clean about "adding notes" to the yearbook indirectly admits forgery...along with the clear indication of the entire right side of his "signature", with forged notes, were added with a different ink. So either a Ray, or another Roy signed the book. Doesn't mean Roy Moore did it.

Roy was also assigned to her court case in 1999, where she didn't make a motion to recuse him from being her judge, which was 18 years CLOSER to the assault. But hey, she just so happens to be triggered by it because he was about to be elected right?

1. The "Old Hickory" House (signed on yearbook) she claimed they met up at is called OLDE Hickory House.

2. She claimed she worked there at 15. A former employee pointed out you had to be 16 to work there.

3. She claimed the dumpsters where the incident happened were at the back of the house, employees said they were at the back.

4. Olde Hickory House sat right off of the four-lane highway and had a wrap-around porch with lights all around it. Nelson claimed that the surroundings were "dark and isolated.

5. Rhonda Ledbetter, who worked at Olde Hickory House for almost 3 years, states that the earliest it closed was at 11 p.m. but she believes it was open until midnight. She is certain it did not close at 10:00 because Goodyear was next door, and employees came to eat when their shift ended at 10 p.m. Nelson claims her story occurred after the restaurant closed at 10 p.m

6. It is unlikely that there was an entrance from the back of the parking lot, which Nelson claimed existed. Multiple sources have claimed that everyone parked on the sides of the building because there wasn’t much room behind the restaurant, according to Rhonda not enough room to turn around. Renee Schivera stated that a neighborhood backed up to the parking lot and it was adjacent to the backyards of people’s houses, so she did not see how there would have been a back entrance as it would have gone through someone’s yard.

7. Nelson claimed that Judge Roy Moore came in almost every night and sat at the counter, but former employees state that customers at the counter were served by the bartender or short order cook - not served by the waitresses and had no reason to interact with the wait staff. Additionally, two former waitresses and two former patrons state they never saw Judge Moore come into the restaurant.

(These witnesses have shared their testimony with multiple news outlets. The outlets have failed to report.)

That doesn't at all "indirectly admit forgery". Who are you to say when someone must "come forward" about assault? She added the date and location for her own records, she admitted to that. Trying to use that as some sort of strawman to indicate the rest of the entry as being forged is ridiculous. You have absolutely no way to say "Either ray, or another Roy signed it" as fact. Zero. It is literally impossible for you to make that statement unless it's coupled with "in my opinion".

She's recalling an incident from a very long time ago, of course some of the details would be hazy. It's actually more evidence of being a lie when the story is "perfect" because that means it's rehearsed. When you recall a memory you're not recalling the actual memory, that's not how the brain works, you're recalling the last time you recalled the memory. So all of your points are moot and are just used to try and detract from the very real claim. A claim that was reaffirmed by numerous women. Not just one. The fact that you're willing to completely write off such a horrendous claim because she didn't exactly remember where dumpsters were located shows your bias.

Why is it so easy for you to assume that her claims are fake, but the claims of other people MUST be true? There's no way the other "witnesses" were coerced in any way or have their own agenda. Only the side that opposes your tribalism can be called into question.

That's why you can't be taken serious. You are the most biased "thinker" on this board and you ignore anything that suggests you could be wrong.

So please, show me the debunking of the other 7+ women that came forward. Debunk the interview where he said himself that he dated teenagers in his 30's. Stop using logical fallacies to target one argument and pretend it affects all the rest.

I see through you. And you're a sad little man.

Well Tadgh, considering when you add to something somebody wrote, you’re forging it. Do that to a bank check. It’s not that fucking complicated to understand... The timing is a dead give away, you’re being purposely blind.

If she cared about the incident from that long ago, she should have done something sooner considering he was involved in her life afterwards. Again, it’s not that fucking complicated. We don’t have to breakdown the areas of the brain that contributes to memories. She chose to bring this up as a political tactic, not emotional clarity. When they do this, especially before an election, it completely takes away their will to be taken serious from everyone other than the left and you SJWs.

Where’s the proof from these other women other than being represented from Gloria Allred, who represented all of the Trump accusers who you hardly hear from anymore.

There actions are obvious but invisible to people like you.

I clearly am not biased.

How fucking dare you label me

[iHigh]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

[MENTION=33819]Eke[/MENTION]
" Moore recognized right away that the inscription was different from the notes below it. He told his lawyer that there was “no way in the world” he had written the notes. But he didn’t extend that claim to the inscription. Instead, he suggested that “tampering” had occurred.

Tampering is a different allegation from forgery. It implies that the underlying entity, the thing that’s been tampered with, is real."
Thoughts?

[Clarke Reloaded]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

reporting a sexual assault as soon as it happens and not 90 years later might help

[Clarke Reloaded]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

LMAO moose and ekelon having a tragic mental breakdown itt.


This thread sure did blow up in your faces didn't it? Got moose so shook he's agreeing with tadgh.

[ekeanon]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

[MENTION=33819]Eke[/MENTION]
" Moore recognized right away that the inscription was different from the notes below it. He told his lawyer that there was “no way in the world” he had written the notes. But he didn’t extend that claim to the inscription. Instead, he suggested that “tampering” had occurred.

Tampering is a different allegation from forgery. It implies that the underlying entity, the thing that’s been tampered with, is real."
Thoughts?

From what I’ve read, he has denied signing the yearbook.

[Clarke Reloaded]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

[MENTION=33819]Eke[/MENTION]
" Moore recognized right away that the inscription was different from the notes below it. He told his lawyer that there was “no way in the world” he had written the notes. But he didn’t extend that claim to the inscription. Instead, he suggested that “tampering” had occurred.

Tampering is a different allegation from forgery. It implies that the underlying entity, the thing that’s been tampered with, is real."
Thoughts?

From what I’ve read, he has denied signing the yearbook.

You know a wise man told me reading is believing

So its got to be true

[Clarke Reloaded]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

This graph shows, it was white ignorant racist southern hicks who voted for Roy Moore despite him being a clear as day pedophile.


Lmao trump supporters are looking more and more pathetic by the day! What a bunch of losers

Moose and Ekelon be like:

[Moose]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

Clarke can't even explain what that graph illustrates.

[Clarke Reloaded]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

Mostly deep red counties are left.

Can't wait for Robin tears.

No but here's yours:

[iHigh]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

Mostly deep red counties are left.

Can't wait for Robin tears.

No but here's yours:

[Moose]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

Good one, Clarke. It only took you a full day to come up with.

[Clarke Reloaded]

Re: Alabama Senate election Moore vs Jones

Good one, Clarke. It only took you a full day to come up with.

*yawn* another bad insult... it took half a sec for that one